[Pc_Support] Question about LCD speed.

[Bryan J. Smith]

On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 00:36 -0600, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> Yepper.  16ms is minimum at 60Hz.  12ms makes it perfect.  8ms leaves no
> doubt (and would take 120Hz, if the monitors took such a signal -- might
> be nice for 3D shutter glasses, but I haven't seen one capable yet).
> The only kicker is the 1280x1024 resolution.
> Few full-screen titles run well at 1280x1024, some force 1280x960, and
> there's no "perfect divisor" to any other resolution -- and 640x480 is a
> tad small.

But I'm happy with my dual 19" monitors (primary 8ms, secondary 25ms).
I can deal with 1280x1024 -- it's not killer that I have 1600x1200.

That's a much better deal for $500 IMHO.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith     b.j.smith at ieee.org     http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman