[Pc_Support] Re: Backing up 1-4TiB: LTO-3,
SDLT or SAIT? -- corrections/addendeum
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Wed Aug 10 12:11:41 EDT 2005
"Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith at ieee.org> wrote:
> BTW, I'm considering the HP 1/8 Autoloader with an Ultrium
> 960 drive, so native capacity is 3.2GiB with a 80GBps
> transfer rate over Ultra320 SCSI.
Er, that should read "native 3.2*T*iB [aggregate] capacity"
with a "80*M*Bps [native] transfer rate" (doh!). Typical
performance with 2:1 compression results in around 160MBps,
which is enough to saturate even the 1Gbps GbE "out-of-band"
links I'm planning on using between the NetBackup server and
its agent systems.
Although I plan on using buffering and delaying committal to
tape. In fact, I think another benefit of LTO is that it can
do variable write speeds, so it can "slow down" to
accommodate the incoming stream. I haven't researched AIT,
but I don't think DLT can do that.
--
Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org | (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers)
More information about the Pc_support
mailing list